Skip to main content
Topic: update weirdness (Read 3180 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

update weirdness

(1/8) Updating linux-lts initcpios
==> Building image from preset: /etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux-lts.preset: 'default'
  -> -k /boot/vmlinuz-linux-lts -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux-lts.img
==> Starting build: 4.9.59-1-lts
  -> Running build hook: [base]
  -> Running build hook: [udev]
  -> Running build hook: [autodetect]
findmnt: error while loading shared libraries: libudev.so.1: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
==> ERROR: failed to detect root filesystem
findmnt: error while loading shared libraries: libudev.so.1: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32


 

Re: update weirdness

Reply #2
We talked about this on IRC and it looks like reinstalling libeudev helped.

I kind of think that these post update scripts should be rerun or whole update should be rerun in order to get things to work properly or you might end with more problems.

Re: update weirdness

Reply #3
how do you redo the whole update?


Re: update weirdness

Reply #5
==> Building image from preset: /etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux-lts.preset: 'fallback'
  -> -k /boot/vmlinuz-linux-lts -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux-lts-fallback.img -S autodetect
==> Starting build: 4.9.59-1-lts
  -> Running build hook: [base]
  -> Running build hook: [udev]
  -> Running build hook: [modconf]
  -> Running build hook: [block]
==> WARNING: Possibly missing firmware for module: aic94xx
==> WARNING: Possibly missing firmware for module: wd719x
  -> Running build hook: [keyboard]
  -> Running build hook: [keymap]
  -> Running build hook: [resume]
  -> Running build hook: [filesystems]
  -> Running build hook: [fsck]

Re: update weirdness

Reply #6
==> Building image from preset: /etc/mkinitcpio.d/linux-lts.preset: 'fallback'
  -> -k /boot/vmlinuz-linux-lts -c /etc/mkinitcpio.conf -g /boot/initramfs-linux-lts-fallback.img -S autodetect
==> Starting build: 4.9.59-1-lts
  -> Running build hook: [base]
  -> Running build hook: [udev]
  -> Running build hook: [modconf]
  -> Running build hook: [block]
==> WARNING: Possibly missing firmware for module: aic94xx
==> WARNING: Possibly missing firmware for module: wd719x
  -> Running build hook: [keyboard]
  -> Running build hook: [keymap]
  -> Running build hook: [resume]
  -> Running build hook: [filesystems]
  -> Running build hook: [fsck]

nothing to worry about its on the fallback image which wants every module loaded even if the module does not apply to your kernel as long as you never see the message on the normal build script nothing to worry about.

Re: update weirdness

Reply #7
Are you running on an old Dell GX7** ?
Because I use to have the same warnings.  I looked the drivers/firmware up, installed them, and the warnings went away.

Here, read this https://sysdfree.wordpress.com/140


Re: update weirdness

Reply #9
They keyword in those messages is "Possibly missing"
aic94xx is a sequencer from adaptec
wd719x is for a western digital SCSI card

If you don't have those 2 pieces of hardware in your computer those messages can be safely ignored.
Chris Cromer

Re: update weirdness

Reply #10
Quote
aic94xx is a sequencer from adaptec

I thought that was an old scsi card as well, perhaps an IDE based one.

Re: update weirdness

Reply #11
I'm used to updates with no warning messages

Re: update weirdness

Reply #12
If you don't want to see those messages you can install the firmware for those devices from the AUR. Those firmware will then be added to fallback initcpio image.
Chris Cromer

Re: update weirdness

Reply #13
I didn't mean that as anything other than a constructive comment, but let me ask a couple of questions with regard to this.

First, are those devices only workable with binary non-free blobs?  If not, wouldn't it be best for the update to facilitate free kernel modules? Either way, wouldn't it make sense for the update to be consistant with the default system installation and for the firmware modules to be only updates if the firmware packages are loaded with pacman?  It is obviously not critical, but over time these kinds of things can snowball into confusion.

Re: update weirdness

Reply #14
I wasn't trying to sound harsh if it came across that way. Was just trying to inform you as to how you can remove those warnings.

Those are not kernel modules. Those are binary firmware blobs. Also the problem isn't the update system. The warnings come from mkinitcpio which tries to add those to the fallback image. To address this problem a bug report should be filed against mkinitcpio, however these warnings have been around in arch linux for many years so I doubt they will do anything now.
Chris Cromer